WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:09.000
Knowing which skill is weak isn't enough, you also need to know why.

00:09.000 --> 00:14.440
In this video, you'll learn to use three tabs that separate four very different causes,

00:14.440 --> 00:16.920
each needing a different response.

00:16.920 --> 00:23.240
Bloom and DOK shows cognitive demand is shown by a DOK levels, and Bloom labeled strands

00:23.240 --> 00:27.120
aren't surfaced separately in the current entry skin payload.

00:27.120 --> 00:29.280
For levels, recall.

00:29.280 --> 00:31.600
Deal and concept.

00:31.600 --> 00:33.280
Strategic thinking.

00:33.280 --> 00:34.760
Extended thinking.

00:34.760 --> 00:35.760
First pattern.

00:35.760 --> 00:37.280
Strong on recall.

00:37.280 --> 00:39.480
Week on strategic thinking.

00:39.480 --> 00:42.280
Your students already know the content.

00:42.280 --> 00:43.720
Teaching it again won't help.

00:43.720 --> 00:46.120
They need to practice using it.

00:46.120 --> 00:47.120
Second pattern.

00:47.120 --> 00:50.000
Week at every level, including recall.

00:50.000 --> 00:55.080
This is a knowledge gap, and re-teaching the content is exactly right.

00:55.080 --> 00:59.200
These two look identical on a mark sheet and need opposite responses.

00:59.200 --> 01:02.040
That's what this tab is for.

01:02.040 --> 01:08.800
Difficulty analysis shows performance across difficulty bands, broken down by DOK level.

01:08.800 --> 01:10.400
Third pattern.

01:10.400 --> 01:13.840
Performance collapses only at the hardest band.

01:13.840 --> 01:17.960
That may not be a learning gap at all, the assessment may simply have been pitched

01:17.960 --> 01:19.760
above the cohort.

01:19.760 --> 01:24.280
Check the assessment's difficulty settings before planning intervention.

01:24.280 --> 01:25.560
Third pattern.

01:25.560 --> 01:30.800
One question everyone got wrong, with most choosing the same wrong option.

01:30.800 --> 01:32.920
That isn't a spread of ability.

01:32.920 --> 01:39.760
It's a single shared misconception, which is one lesson to fix, possibly one explanation.

01:39.760 --> 01:45.400
Go back to the question in your bank and read the distractor to see exactly what they believed.

01:45.400 --> 01:49.600
It's also worth asking whether the item itself was flawed.

01:49.600 --> 01:54.640
Question analysis is how you find questions worth revising or retiring.

01:54.640 --> 02:01.600
Question analysis at the top, for summary tile show items, total questions, average accuracy,

02:01.600 --> 02:06.480
average skip rate, and average discrimination for the whole assessment.

02:06.480 --> 02:12.160
The accuracy by item bar chart plots each question's accuracy side by side, making it

02:12.160 --> 02:16.000
easy to spot which question students struggled with most.

02:16.000 --> 02:19.560
Below that, each question gets its own card.

02:19.560 --> 02:26.960
Showing the question text, it's type in tags like academic, true slash false, DOK level,

02:26.960 --> 02:34.240
followed by four stats, accuracy, skip rate, stored difficulty, and discrimination.

02:34.240 --> 02:40.520
At the bottom of each card, buttons break down responses into correct, needs review, and

02:40.520 --> 02:42.440
skipped counts.

02:42.440 --> 02:44.120
Knowledge gap.

02:44.120 --> 02:45.600
Application gap.

02:45.600 --> 02:51.280
The artifact, shared misconception, for causes for different responses.